| 聂新光,杨文东.湿润烧伤膏治疗危重症患者肛周皮损的临床疗效[J].中国烧伤创疡杂志,2012,24(3):214~216. |
| DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1001-0726.2012.3.014 |
| 中文关键词: 湿润烧伤膏 肛周皮损 大便失禁 危重症患者 疗效 |
| 英文关键词:MEBO Wound Ointment (MEBO) Perianal skin defect Incontinence Critically ill patient Efficacy |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 2614 |
| 全文下载次数: 3557 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 目的 观察湿润烧伤膏治疗大便失禁的危重症患者肛周皮损的临床疗效。方法 将92例患者按照大便失禁出现的时间顺序分为观察组57例和对照组35例，观察组外涂湿润烧伤膏换药治疗，对照组外涂凡士林软膏换药治疗，比较两组患者痊愈时间及愈合效果。结果 观察组的治愈率（80.7%）及总有效率（100%）均显著高于对照组（37.1%、65.7%），p<0.01；观察组的治愈时间4.9d±1.6显著短于对照组7.7d±2.8d，p<0.01。结论 湿润烧伤膏治疗大便失禁的危重症患者肛周皮损疗效显著，值得临床推广应用。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Objective: To observe the clinical efficacy of MEBO in treating the perianal skin defects of incontinent critically ill patients. Methods: A total of 92 patients were divided into a experimental group (57 patients) and a control group (35 patients) based on the occurrence sequence of incontinence. Patients in the experimental group received MEBO while Vaseline gauze was used in the control group. The clinical efficacy and healing time of both groups were observed and compared. Results: The curative rate (80.7%）and the total effective rate (100%） in the experimental group were significantly superior to that in the control group (37.1% and 65.7% respectively) (P＜0.01). The healing time （4.9d±1.6d）in the experimental group was much shorter than that in the control group （7.7d±2.8d）(P＜0.01). Conclusion: MEBO has significant effects in treating a perianal skin defect of incontinent critically ill patient, and is worthy to be promoted and popularized. |
|
