戴清波,汪黔筑,陈光菊,郭 江,付子俊.原位再生医疗技术治疗肛肠疾病术后创面疼痛的疗效分析[J].中国烧伤创疡杂志,2017,(4):288~291. |
DOI: |
中文关键词: 原位再生医疗技术 肛肠疾病 术后 创面 疗效 |
英文关键词:The in situ regenerative medical technology Anorectal disease Post-operation Wounds Curative effect |
基金项目: |
|
摘要点击次数: 2909 |
全文下载次数: 5365 |
中文摘要: |
【摘要】 目的 探讨原位再生医疗技术治疗肛肠疾病术后创面疼痛的临床疗效?方法 将2015 年1 月—2016 年12 月清镇市中医院普外科收治的161 例肛肠疾病患者随机分为试验组(82 例) 与对照组(79 例), 试验组患者术后创面应用湿润烧伤膏治疗, 对照组患者术后创面应用马应龙麝香痔疮膏治疗, 对比观察两组患者的创面疼痛情况及住院时间?结果 试验组患者住院时间为(6.11 ±2.13) d, 使用盐酸哌替啶止痛者(即严重疼痛者) 4 例, 使用盐酸曲马多止痛者(即重度疼痛者) 6 例, 使用氯诺昔康止痛者(即中度疼痛者) 16 例, 未使用镇痛药物者(即无疼痛或轻度疼痛者) 56 例; 对照组患者住院时间为(8.36 ±2.26) d, 使用盐酸哌替啶止痛者(即严重疼痛者) 54 例, 使用盐酸曲马多止痛者(即重度疼痛者) 16 例, 使用氯诺昔康止痛者(即中度疼痛者)9 例, 未使用镇痛药物者(即无疼痛或轻度疼痛者) 0 例?两组患者住院时间及镇痛药物使用情况对比, P 均<0.01, 差异具有统计学意义?结论 原位再生医疗技术治疗肛肠疾病术后创面, 可有效缓解术后创面疼痛, 促进创面愈合, 缩短患者住院时间, 值得临床推广应用? |
英文摘要: |
【Abstract】Objective: To study the clinical efficacy of the in situ regenerative medical technology in the treatment of post-operation wound pain of anorectal diseases. Methods: One hundred and Sixty-one patients with anorectal diseases admitted into the General Surgery Department of Qingzhen Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine between January 2015 and December 2016 were randomly divided into an experimental group (82 patients) and a control group (79 patients). The post-operation wounds of patients in the control group were treated with Mayinglong hemorrhoids ointment, while the post-operation wounds of patients in the experimental group were treated with MEBO. The wound pain severity and length of hospital stay in the two groups were observed and compared. Results: In the experimental group, patients’ length of hospital stay was (6.11±2.13)d,and for pain relief, 4 patients (with extreme pain) used Pethidine Hydrochloride, 6 patients (with severe pain) used hydrochloride tramadol, 16 patients (with moderate pain) used Lornoxicam and the other 56 patients (with mild or no pain) didn’t use any pain killers, while in the control group, patients’ length of hospital stay was (8.36±2.26)d, and for pain relief, 54 patients (with extreme pain) used Pethidine Hydrochloride, 16 patients (with severe pain) used hydrochloride tramadol, and the left 9 patients (with moderate pain) used Lornoxicam, which means all patients in the control group used some kind of pain killers. The comparisons between the two groups in terms of patients’ length of hospital stay and the application of pain killers both showed statistically significant difference, p<0.01. Conclusion: The in situ regenerative medical technology in the treatment of post-operation wounds of anorectal diseases can effectively relieve the wound pain, promote wound healing and shorten patients’ length of hopsital stay, derserving to be promoted in clinical practice. |
|
|
|
|