| 张云飞,侯静文,马晓君.MEBT/MEBO与PRP治疗糖尿病慢性溃疡的疗效对比分析[J].中国烧伤创疡杂志,2023,(4):258~261. |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 创疡再生医疗技术 富血小板血浆 糖尿病溃疡 慢性溃疡 创面 |
| 英文关键词:MEBT/ MEBO Platelet-rich plasma Diabetic ulcer Chronic ulcer Wound |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 1599 |
| 全文下载次数: 4597 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 【摘要】 目的 对比分析创疡再生医疗技术 (MEBT/ MEBO) 与富血小板血浆 (PRP) 治疗糖尿病慢性溃疡的临床疗效。 方法 选取2020年7月至2021年7月郑州大学第一附属医院收治的100例糖尿病溃疡患者作为研究对象, 并按照不同治疗方法将其分为 MEBT/ MEBO组(50例)与PRP组 (50 例), MEBT/ MEBO 组患者局部创面予以 MEBT/ MEBO 治疗, PRP 组患者局部创面予以 PRP 治疗, 对比观察两组患者创面渗液 pH值、疼痛程度、愈合情况以及临床疗效。 结果 治疗第5、10天, MEBT/ MEBO 组患者创面渗液pH值、五指疼痛评分法(FFM)评分、Bates-Jensen伤口评估与效果评价量表 (BWAT) 评分均明显低于PRP组(治疗第5天: t = 4.030?3.269、5.512, P < 0.001、P = 0.002、P < 0.001; 治疗第 10 天: t = 6.790、4.889、5.540, P 均 < 0.001)。 治疗4周后, MEBT/ MEBO 组患者创面治愈 14 例、显效 16 例、有效 17 例、无效3例, 明显优于PRP组患者的创面治愈 8 例、显效 14 例、有效 20 例、无效 8 例 (Z = - 1.965, P = 0.049)。结论 与 PRP 相比, MEBT/ MEBO 更能有效降低糖尿病慢性溃疡创面 pH 值, 减轻创面疼痛, 疗效更好。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| 【Abstract】 Objective To compared the clinical efficacy of the regenerative medical technology for wounds and ulcers (MEBT/ MEBO) and platelet?rich plasma (PRP) in the treatment of diabetic chronic ulcer. Methods 100 patient with diabetic ulcer admitted into The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University between July 2020 and July 2021 were enrolled as research subjects, and divided into MEBT/ MEBO group (n = 50) and PRP group (n = 50) according to different treatments they received. The local wounds of patients in the MEBT/ MEBO group were treated with MEBT/ MEBO,while the local wounds of patients were treated with PRP in the PRP group. The pH value of wound exudate, pain degree, wound healing condition and clinical efficacy were compared between the two groups. Results Respectively on day 5 and 10 of treatment, the pH values of wound exudate, five-finger measure (FFM) scores, scores of Bates-Jensen wound assessment tool (BWAT) of patients in the MEBT/ MEBO group were all markedly lower than that in the PRP group ( day 5 of treatment: t = 4.030, 3.269 and 5.512, P < 0.001, P = 0.002, P < 0.001; day 10 of treatment: t = 6.790, 4.889 and 5.540, all P < 0.001). After 4 weeks of treatment, the wounds of 14 cases were cured, 16 cases showed markedlyeffective, 17 cases were effective and 3 cases were ineffective in the MEBT/ MEBO group, being obviously better than that in the PRP group (Z = - 1.965, P = 0.049) -8 cases cured, 14 cases markedly effective, 20 cases effective and 8 cases ineffective. Conclusion Compared with PRP, the MEBT/ MEBO is much better in decreasing pH value of wound exudate of diabetic chronic ulcer and alleviating wound pain, realizing better clinical efficacy. |
|
|
|
|
